Archive for Cyber Society

A Post-Broadcast Politics

One of my “hobbies” as it where, is studying and reflecting upon political imagery. This image here reminded me of a photo I saw last June on Michael Shaw’s blog, Bag News Notes.

Shaw has a new piece at American Photo, “Campaign Visuals in the Age of Facebook.” In it, he interviews photographer Stephen Ferry to discuss this photo which resembles a “Facebook mashup.” Ferry says his photo captures what he calls the, “Facebook zeitgeist.” He explains the action of the photo thus, ” this is a photograph of a transmission: from subject into camera and from camera onto the Web.”

I’m intrigued by the act of transmission and how transmission is reconceptualized within a digital culture. In the Ferry photo, the subjects are both Obama and a “fan taking a photo” ready for immediate upload onto Facebook or some other online social media. In this image above, there are also two subjects, but they are not Hillary and the person shooting the video. The “real” Hillary is blurred, the campaign sign is even upside down. However, the digital image of Hillary is clear and focused which is connected to the video camera being held by an anonymous hand. The two subjects are thus machine and digital image, even the human hand is secondary. From this perspective, the image portrays a postmodernization of political campaigning. It’s the political reflection of TIME’s 2006 person of the year as the new citizen journalist. The digital transmission onto the Web is naturally assumed.

However, this image for me captures more than just the “Facebook zeitgeist.” It also reflects the shift away from the hierarchical broadcast model of information transmission to the decentralized network model of inter-subjective community driven “transmission.” Perhaps this could be called the era of post-broadcast politics. The centrality of the camera’s view finder, which invites everyone into the role of transmitter reinforces this shifting narrative. What do you think?

photograph source unknown

UPDATE: Matt Stoller has an article in the Nation, “Dems Get New Tools, New Talent,” where he analyzes the impact of internet technologies on Democratic campaign organizing.

We are in the middle of a massive wave of campaign innovation, led by organizers who will eventually spread outward to every nook and cranny of progressive politics. The larger significance of this architectural revolution in progressive politics isn’t clear, but it is the first sustained challenge to the dominance of television and direct mail in the political system since those media displaced urban party machines in the 1960s.

How to Caucus in Iowa

Have you ever wondered how the Iowa Caucus works? John Edwards has released this instructional Youtube video for his Iowa Precinct Captains. I especially like the jazzy theme music reminiscent of an early 70’s TV series. The men have even been reminded to pre-record the Orange Bowl before leaving to caucus. Overall, I think this video will be effective. This represents yet another great example of how some of the candidates are using online platforms as disintermediating tools.

The Cyber-Libertarian Candidacy

I spend a disproportionate amount of time examining the Democratic candidates online presence than that of the Republicans. There is some built-in prejudice but mainly that’s because the Left is so much more adapt with the new technologies. Furthermore, highly new media literate people vote democratic by some 2 to 1. This is a rough guess as data is still a bit sketchy. When you look at broadband penetration and interenet use across the country, you wind up with that classic red/blue map that shows high levels a blue along the coasts and in major cities. This of course is where the highest concentration of Democratic voters reside.

However, the internet also has a strong libertarian tradition. If you look at all the Republican candidates we see a basic representation of neo-conservatism, nativists and Christian “values voters.” However, there is a solid libertarian in the pack, Dr. Ron Paul of Texas.

He’s raised over 7 million online and accounts for the largest constinuancy of online Republican activism. Its hard to say who are cyber-libertarians drawn to Ron Paul and who are classic libertarians drawn to the internet because of Ron Paul.

Chris Bowers noted earlier today,

“He started the day at $2.77M raised for this quarter, and is currently up to $6.5M.Looks like he will pass $4M today, which is probably a record amount of money to be raised in a single day online, or something.”

Ron Paul is the leading internet candidate of all the parties. He outperforms everyone if we measure Google searches, Youtube views, and web 2.0 social networking. The fact that he is raising “big money” is the real proof of his popularity and viability. Should he not be nominated for the Republican ticket could a 3rd party candidacy be viable?

Time magazine has an interesting article about Ron Paul’s cyber presence. He points out an important reason why traditional polling may not be representative of the reality on the ground.

But if Ron Paul tops all of the Web metrics for popularity, like searches and traffic from social networks, then how can he be so far down in the Gallup Poll?

The answer may be in the difference between the people who answer a pollster’s phone call and the people who don’t. Younger adults are abandoning their landline phones for cell phones, so including this demographic in phone-based polls seems unlikely.

This is a fairly good article but Bill Tancer just can’t hold back his contempt for the next generation of online activism, despite working in the field of online marketing. He concludes,

“Despite his success on the Web, the gap between Paul’s poll standing and online popularity highlights a bigger problem for the doctor from Texas. Can his wired supporters take a break from shout-outs, sending virtual drinks and writing on virtual walls to shut down their computers and go out and vote?”

It reminds me of the NY Times depiction of online political activists as unemployed 20 somethings living at home in their mother’s basement. The NY Times is now blogging of course.

It will be interesting to see how libertarian values are pushed through to the main stream through the internet. I am guessing that there are a lot more people in America that are and have been libertarian than say, neo-conservative. Ron Paul an many ways represents to the Republican party what John Edwards represents to the Democrats; a challenge to party political identity.

Facebook as a Learning Platform

This should be a gooding starting point for thinking about how we can utilize Facebook within our academic environment. Here’s an earlier article I link to which makes a similar case.

For the upcoming Free Online Conference - Corporate Learning: Trends and Innovations we wanted to have a way for participants to get to know other participants and hold discussions. While we are going to use Q2 Learning’s platform, we could have created a group in Facebook and used the threaded discussion capability there. The advantage of that is that likely a sizable portion of the audience is already on Facebook and thus wouldn’t have to upload profile information. This also would allow the relation(friend)ships created during the process to exist beyond the conference.

Democrats, look West

“A new breed of ‘progressives’ is shifting the party’s center of gravity from the South and Northeast.

This new progressive movement, which now exerts a strong gravitational pull on the direction of Democratic politics, is a national phenomenon, but much of its financing and intellectual energy comes from the West.”


I think Bai is spot on with this last statement. Much of the “new progressivism” has emerged from a very tech savvy online community which has much of its roots on the West Coast. I’ve always considered that the early (1980’s) online communities and ideologies represented two distinct traditions; libertarian and communitarian. Much of those early online political and cultural values have shaped the modern online progressive activist ideology.
Bai writes;

“Because West Coast progressives were among the earliest innovators in the new technologies of the Digital Age, it’s not surprising that their movement champions interactivity and the use of the Internet as a tool for organizing and messaging.”

One of the foundational principals of the online progressive community is transparency. This explains, at least in part, why the online Left is so far ahead of the Right. The principals of transparency, open source, and collaboration fundamentally open up online activism for greater democratic participation and political innovation.

“The goal of this new movement, to the extent that it can be readily distilled, is to create a Democratic Party that is more responsive to its disaffected liberal base rather than to just single-issue groups and undecided voters.”

Last December, I worked on a project for Vibeke’s class on American Patriotism titled, Electronic Dissent and the American Left.This was the crux of my main argument;

“The struggle for equality and justice in American history can be seen through attempts of the Left to define and create communities capable of enriching people’s lives and providing political power. However, a major theme in American political thinking since the emergence of the New Left in the 1960’s has revolved around the disconnect of leftist political philosophy from translating into any meaningful or lasting political action. Today there is a real and substantial reconnect, but its not being led by the old guard academic Left, its coming directly from the people, enabled with new and powerful communication technologies which are revolutionizing our understanding of community and the basis of political power.”

Bai goes on to write;

“Understanding this seismic shift in Democratic politics, from a party dominated by a tired, receding East-South establishment to one defined by an East-West alliance, and especially by the influence of technology-savvy Western progressives, will be critical to making sense of the coming campaign.”

I think overall Bai makes some great points which follow my line of reasoning. I wouldn’t place all the focus on the Netroots however. Absolutely, anyone who doesn’t understand this very unique and growing constintuency within the Democratic party may not be able to fully grasp the changing social and political environment. However, demographics are also comming into play as many of the Western Mountain States turn blue, or at least purple. This is brought on by the large out migrations of tech industry folks from California. Furthermore, the disparity between working and middle classes and the wealthy has been increasing for 30 years. This combined with the overall dissatisfaction of the Bush presidency and the disilussionment of “compassionate conservatism” bodes very well for Democrats. However, the Netroots goal is not merely Democratic victories, but a transformation of the soul of the Democratic party. The Netroots are claiming the “intelectual” mantle from the “New Left”, stressing solidarity over single issue driven politics. The Academic Left seems to be following the lead of the Netroots, which do not represent academia, yet for the most part are middle-class, educated, professional citizen activists. By no means is the Netroots monolithic. Already fractures and disputes are occurring from within the ranks of some of the leading online voices. Perhaps the “Netroots will fracture and/or become co-opted by traditonal Democratic power structures. Maybe unions and other grass roots organizations will become more adept at messaging and activism within the new media paradigm. So far, the Online Left has not made any real meaningful organizational alliances with labor. I think this is more the fault of Progressives than Labor, but both groups are the worse off for it. Finally, one must always consider the possibility of government regulation which could ultimately hamper the current open and egalitarian structure of the internet. One thing is for sure however. Online is where the action is today. It may be yet too soon to claim the American Frontier is closed.

Facebook


Michael Hirschorn argues that, “by bringing order to the Web, Facebook could become as important to us as Google”

At the moment, Facebook is the site that, in my experience, comes closest to fulfilling the promise of social media. In so doing, it raises some bigger questions about how we’re going to be using the Web in the future and whether some of the received wisdom about the Internet—that we’re headed inexorably toward a digital universe of chaotic, endlessly shifting interactivity—is true.

First MTV/MySpace Presidential Dialogue

“In another sign that the upcoming presidential election is truly the first of the digital age, MTV and MySpace are teaming up to present the first-ever presidential debate to feature real time, one-on-one dialogues between candidates and voters.”

“The first hour-long town-hall style dialogue will take place on September 27 with former Sen. John Edwards in the early primary state of New Hampshire. MTV viewers and MTV.com and MySpace users will be able to submit questions for the events through MySpaceIM, mobile devices and e-mail while they watch the live webcast. At the same time, online viewer reaction will be monitored through live polling on both MTV.com and MySpace.com.”

In the spirit of user-generated content, which is what’s driving this new political format, I’ve uploaded this Youtube video which does a great job of highlighting the important points about the Myspace and Youtube forums.